Daniel Paty vs Drew Van Orderlain Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W L L
Form
L W L L L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Paty 1 - 0 Orderlain
They have played 2 sets in total, with Paty winning 2 and Orderlain winning 0. The last match between Paty and Orderlain was at the M15 Naples, 18-02-2025, Q3, Clay with Daniel Paty getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Paty | 1 |
| Drew Van Orderlain | 0 |
M15 Naples(18-02-2025)
6
1
6
4
| Paty | Stats | Orderlain |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (9-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (6-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 793 | Ranking | N/A |
| 648 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 25 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (129-114) | Career Total W/L | 41% (115-167) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Stefan Popovic
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Daniel Paty
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
59
|
6-0 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
67%
(
8 of
12)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
20
Total Points Won
10
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Marlon Vankan
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
10
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
0
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Benjamin Saltman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Drew Van Orderlain Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Dickerson
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 4-6 14-12 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
48 of
70)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charlie Robertson
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
54
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Taha Baadi
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (129/114) | Win/Loss | 41% (115/167) |
| 52% (285/260) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (263/360) |
| 52% (2808/2587) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (2690/2935) |
| 50% (8/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (41/60) |
| 57% (114/87) | Clay Win/Loss | 39% (46/73) |
| 27% (7/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (28/34) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 774 | Aces Total | 142 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 369 | Total Double Faults | 196 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 90.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 210.04 |
| 60% (5227/8778) | 1st Serve % | 65% (3314/5103) |
| 71% (3725/5227) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1973/3314) |
| 49% (1753/3551) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (846/1789) |
| 41% (306/747) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (220/485) |
| 38% (3252/8652) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1964/4904) |
| 0% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 54% (129/111) | Futures W/L | 41% (115/163) |
| 53% (128/242) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (114/280) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 41% (24/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (16/42) |
| 53% (32/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (26/59) |
| 89% (130/116) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (115/102) |
| 11% (130/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (115/13) |
| 12% (113/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (167/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
